Skip to main content
Design-partner cohort open · evidence-backed accessibility operationsApply
Verassaerassa
MethodologyPricing
Sign inBook a demo
Loading…
Verassaerassa

Evidence-backed digital accessibility operations with qualified human review, careful claims, and exportable proof.

Private beta

Apply to evaluate the platform →

Platform

  • Overview
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Evidence packages
  • Pricing

Workflows

  • Product and engineering
  • Legal and compliance
  • Accessibility consultancies
  • Ecommerce

Trust

  • Trust Center
  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Claim boundaries

Learn

  • Docs
  • Research
  • Changelog
  • State of Web Accessibility

Company

  • About
  • Contact sales

AI-augmented accessibility evaluation. Findings accelerate audit production but do not replace qualified-reviewer attestation. No scan is a conformance guarantee.

  • Policies
  • Accessibility statement
  • Refused use cases

© 2026 Verassa. Evidence-backed accessibility operations.

Trust Center

Trust, built into the product

How the platform handles security, privacy, evidence, and model routing — and the commitments it is accountable to. Each topic links to the detail.

Book a demoRead the methodology →

Verassa evidence protocol

  1. Evidence

    01

    Screenshot, DOM, replay, and axe baseline captured before decisions.

  2. Judgment

    02

    Reviewer route, rationale, and owner stay attached to lower-confidence work.

  3. Verification

    03

    Re-scan records and disclaimers travel with reportable outputs.

Trust topics

Everything in one place

A trust posture you cannot inspect is a trust posture you have to take on faith. These pages are the inspection.

  • 01

    Security

    SSRF protection, sandboxed scans, encryption, and the credential vault.

  • 02

    Privacy

    Evidence redaction, retention, data residency, and deletion.

  • 03

    Human review policy

    Which outputs require a qualified reviewer, and where the gate sits.

  • 04

    Claim boundaries

    What the product claims, and the claims it will not make.

  • 05

    Refused use cases

    The customer types and use cases we decline to serve.

  • 06

    Open evaluation methodology

    The public test set and methodology you can score the product against.

  • 07

    Advisory board

    Disabled accessibility practitioners with veto authority over claims.

  • 08

    Advisory board charter

    Composition, compensation, veto authority, and dissent protection.

  • 09

    PRD traceability

    Every binding marketing claim traced to its product-spec section.

Why this matters

The discipline is the differentiator

This category was damaged by products that promised more than they could deliver. The honest response is not a louder promise — it is a published, inspectable account of how the product works and what it will not claim.

That is what the Trust Center is. Not a badge, and not a marketing surface — a set of commitments with mechanisms behind them.

Have a question the Trust Center does not answer?

Security and compliance reviewers can reach the team directly.

Contact salesRead the methodology