Skip to main content
Design-partner cohort open · evidence-backed accessibility operationsApply
Verassaerassa
MethodologyPricing
Sign inBook a demo
Loading…
Verassaerassa

Evidence-backed digital accessibility operations with qualified human review, careful claims, and exportable proof.

Private beta

Apply to evaluate the platform →

Platform

  • Overview
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Evidence packages
  • Pricing

Workflows

  • Product and engineering
  • Legal and compliance
  • Accessibility consultancies
  • Ecommerce

Trust

  • Trust Center
  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Claim boundaries

Learn

  • Docs
  • Research
  • Changelog
  • State of Web Accessibility

Company

  • About
  • Contact sales

AI-augmented accessibility evaluation. Findings accelerate audit production but do not replace qualified-reviewer attestation. No scan is a conformance guarantee.

  • Policies
  • Accessibility statement
  • Refused use cases

© 2026 Verassa. Evidence-backed accessibility operations.

Trust Center

Human review policy

Which outputs a model may produce alone, and which require a qualified reviewer — stated plainly, because that boundary is what makes an output trustworthy.

Verassa evidence protocol

  1. Evidence

    01

    Screenshot, DOM, replay, and axe baseline captured before decisions.

  2. Judgment

    02

    Reviewer route, rationale, and owner stay attached to lower-confidence work.

  3. Verification

    03

    Re-scan records and disclaimers travel with reportable outputs.

The gate

What requires human review

Agents do the production work: evaluating a scope, capturing evidence, drafting findings. That work can become an internal working document without a reviewer in the loop, as long as it is clearly labelled as a draft.

Any output a third party will rely on is different. An external report, a VPAT or ACR draft, a defense documentation package — each requires a named qualified reviewer before it leaves the building.

Report states

A report has three states, and they are distinct

A draft internal report carries no external reliance and is generated with a clear draft label. A review-ready report has findings and evidence assembled and waiting for a qualified reviewer. An external-reliance report has been reviewed, carries a named reviewer, and includes the required disclaimer.

A report does not silently move from draft to external-reliance status. Promotion is an explicit step, with a person in it.

Accountability

The reviewer is named

An external-reliance output records who reviewed it and when. A reviewer's name on a deliverable is not decoration — it is the accountability that makes the deliverable defensible.

This is also why the platform will not generate a conformance attestation from agent output alone. Conformance is something a qualified person attests to; the product assembles the evidence that makes that attestation possible.

Back to the Trust Center →