Loading…
For legal and compliance teams
Accessibility posture you can actually see, and an audit trail that documents good-faith remediation activity. The platform does not promise compliance or protection from litigation, because no honest product can.
Verassa evidence protocol
Evidence
01Screenshot, DOM, replay, and axe baseline captured before decisions.
Judgment
02Reviewer route, rationale, and owner stay attached to lower-confidence work.
Verification
03Re-scan records and disclaimers travel with reportable outputs.
The challenge
Legal and compliance teams are usually handed a number — an accessibility score — with very little behind it. A number cannot tell you what was in scope, which barriers are real, or whether anything was done about them.
What a legal team actually needs is a defensible record: what was evaluated, what was found, what was decided, and what was fixed. That is documentation of activity, not a guarantee of an outcome.
How the platform helps
Open findings by severity and flow, with scope stated — not a number with nothing behind it.
An append-only record of every decision: who confirmed, dismissed, or routed what, and why.
Documentation that reflects the evidence, with the required disclaimers.
The screenshots, DOM, and replay behind each finding, ready for review.
External-reliance outputs carry a named reviewer; nothing is attested by a model alone.
A demo walks through the audit trail, the evidence, and the disclaimers on every external output.