Skip to main content
Design-partner cohort open · evidence-backed accessibility operationsApply
Verassaerassa
MethodologyPricing
Sign inBook a demo
Loading…
Verassaerassa

Evidence-backed digital accessibility operations with qualified human review, careful claims, and exportable proof.

Private beta

Apply to evaluate the platform →

Platform

  • Overview
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Evidence packages
  • Pricing

Workflows

  • Product and engineering
  • Legal and compliance
  • Accessibility consultancies
  • Ecommerce

Trust

  • Trust Center
  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Claim boundaries

Learn

  • Docs
  • Research
  • Changelog
  • State of Web Accessibility

Company

  • About
  • Contact sales

AI-augmented accessibility evaluation. Findings accelerate audit production but do not replace qualified-reviewer attestation. No scan is a conformance guarantee.

  • Policies
  • Accessibility statement
  • Refused use cases

© 2026 Verassa. Evidence-backed accessibility operations.

Trust Center

PRD traceability

Every binding marketing claim on this site traces to a section of the product requirements. A claim that cannot be traced is an unbacked promise — so this page makes the trace public.

Verassa evidence protocol

  1. Evidence

    01

    Screenshot, DOM, replay, and axe baseline captured before decisions.

  2. Judgment

    02

    Reviewer route, rationale, and owner stay attached to lower-confidence work.

  3. Verification

    03

    Re-scan records and disclaimers travel with reportable outputs.

Traceability matrix

Marketing surfaces, traced to the spec

Each row is a marketing surface or claim, the product-requirements section it derives from, and the rule that governs how it may be used.

Marketing surface or claimPRD referenceLaunch rule
Allowed / disallowed claim list§1.1Reviewed before launch.
"Diagnose. Decide. Remediate. Verify. Improve." hero§1, §10Allowed.
Disabled-user accountability framing§2.3, §3, §24Reviewed by a disabled reviewer before public launch.
Advisory Board Public Charter page§3.1, §24.1Published, or marked as a pre-paid-launch requirement.
Refused Use Cases page§3.3, §24.3Required before external-reliance outputs are sold.
Open Evaluation Methodology page§3.4Does not overstate evaluation maturity.
Standards Coverage / four profiles§4.1, §4.2Distinguishes Core, Excellence, Legal Baseline, Customer-Selected.
Why Scanners Are Not Enough§5.1Bounded language; no exact coverage statistics unless sourced.
Why Not Overlays§3.3, §5.2Allowed; fact-checked before launch.
Pricing tiers§27.2Reconciled tiers; figures shown as indicative.
Methodology — confidence scoring§13.4, §20.1Allowed, with methodology disclosure.
Methodology — reproducibility hash§20.2Claimed only because the hash is stored.
Methodology — sensitive evidence boundary§20.7.1Public claim tied to logged, enforced routing controls.
Trust Center — outcomes accountability§24.2Defines the 90-day fix-rate calculation.
Trust Center — anti-laundering posture§25Aligned with dismiss/defer and Defense Pack gates.
Free Advocacy tier§3.4, §27.2Allowed.
Comparable-to-human-auditor claim§1.2, §3.4Not used until the published evaluation supports it.

How to read this

If it is not traceable, it does not ship

The product requirements are the source of truth. Before launch, every homepage claim, pricing statement, and Trust Center assertion is checked against this matrix. A claim that cannot be traced is removed from launch copy or downgraded to roadmap language.

PRD references use the product-requirements section numbers. The dashboard widgets and report outputs have their own traceability rows, kept with the product team.

Back to the Trust Center →