Loading…
Trust Center
The claims this product makes, and the ones it will not — because a product built to help customers avoid overclaiming cannot overclaim itself.
Verassa evidence protocol
Evidence
01Screenshot, DOM, replay, and axe baseline captured before decisions.
Judgment
02Reviewer route, rationale, and owner stay attached to lower-confidence work.
Verification
03Re-scan records and disclaimers travel with reportable outputs.
What the product claims
The platform produces evidence-backed findings: each one carries the evidence a reviewer needs to confirm it. It produces audit-grade documentation: reports that reflect that evidence. It reports accessibility posture, the scope a scan covered, and how that posture is trending.
It describes its findings as AI-assisted and its remediation output as proposals for review. These are claims the product can stand behind, because each one is something the evidence supports.
What it will not claim
It does not call a site compliant, accessible, or conformant. A passing scan means the evaluation finished with no findings in that scope — not that a site meets a legal standard.
It does not promise protection from litigation. It does not describe a finding as resolved before verification confirms the barrier is gone. It does not present the diagnostic engine as validated before that engine has cleared its evaluation gate.
Why this page exists
Accessibility is a category where overclaiming has done real harm — to disabled users who trusted a badge, and to buyers who trusted a promise. A product that sells claim discipline to its customers has to model it.
So the boundary is published, here, where anyone can hold the product to it. If a surface of this product ever crosses one of these lines, that is a defect.