Skip to main content
Design-partner cohort open · evidence-backed accessibility operationsApply
Verassaerassa
MethodologyPricing
Sign inBook a demo
Loading…
Verassaerassa

Evidence-backed digital accessibility operations with qualified human review, careful claims, and exportable proof.

Private beta

Apply to evaluate the platform →

Platform

  • Overview
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Evidence packages
  • Pricing

Workflows

  • Product and engineering
  • Legal and compliance
  • Accessibility consultancies
  • Ecommerce

Trust

  • Trust Center
  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Claim boundaries

Learn

  • Docs
  • Research
  • Changelog
  • State of Web Accessibility

Company

  • About
  • Contact sales

AI-augmented accessibility evaluation. Findings accelerate audit production but do not replace qualified-reviewer attestation. No scan is a conformance guarantee.

  • Policies
  • Accessibility statement
  • Refused use cases

© 2026 Verassa. Evidence-backed accessibility operations.

How it works

From a URL to a verified, documented fix

Six steps. Agents do the production work, qualified reviewers make the judgment calls, and every step leaves an evidence trail you can inspect.

Book a demoRead the methodology →
Evidence engine
Sample

Diagnostic pass

A barrier is detected

CriticalWCAG 2.1.1

Checkout step cannot be completed with a keyboard.

The diagnostic surfaces a candidate. On its own that is just a rule trip — not yet something a team can act on or defend.

axe + interaction replay
› target  #checkout-next
› event   keyboard-trap
› impact  serious

Stage 1 of 5: Scan. Scanning the checkout flow.

The workflow

Six steps, one continuous loop

The loop does not end at the report. Monitoring feeds regressions back to step one.

  1. 01

    Define scope

    You set what to audit: the site, the pages and flows, the standards profile, and whether authenticated areas are in scope.

  2. 02

    Run the agent-powered audit

    Diagnostic agents evaluate the scope against WCAG 2.2, capturing evidence as they go.

  3. 03

    Review evidence-backed findings

    Each candidate finding arrives with its evidence and a confidence score, ready for a reviewer.

  4. 04

    Decide and route

    A qualified reviewer confirms a finding, dismisses it with a recorded rationale, or routes it to an owner.

  5. 05

    Remediate and verify

    Approved findings move to remediation; a fix is marked verified when a re-scan confirms the barrier is gone.

  6. 06

    Report and monitor

    Generate audit-grade documentation, then monitor for regressions as the site changes.

What you have at the end

An audit you can defend, not just a score

At the end of a run you have a set of findings, each with its severity, its WCAG criterion, its evidence, and its decision history. You have the rationale for every dismissed finding and a verification record for every fixed one.

That record is what makes the work defensible. It is also what the report is generated from — the documentation reflects the evidence, not a claim layered on top of it.

See the evidence behind a finding →

Walk the workflow with us

A demo runs these six steps on a site you choose.

Book a demoApply for design-partner access