Loading…
Resources
Evidence-led writing on accessibility — practical, sourced, and free of hype. Reviewed by the advisory board before publication.
Verassa evidence protocol
Evidence
01Screenshot, DOM, replay, and axe baseline captured before decisions.
Judgment
02Reviewer route, rationale, and owner stay attached to lower-confidence work.
Verification
03Re-scan records and disclaimers travel with reportable outputs.
What we write about
Plain-language writing on the questions this category tends to get wrong. Each links to the most complete piece available today.
The structural gap between checking for presence and evaluating quality.
The honest history of the overlay market, and what it cost disabled users.
How to tell a finding you can trust from an assertion you cannot.
The 2.2 criteria, and applicable AAA, explained plainly.
What a defensible record of accessibility work actually looks like.
How product teams keep accessibility posture from sliding between audits.
Where the web actually stands, sourced and bounded — not a scare statistic.
The research program is led by evidence and checked by the advisory board — disabled accessibility practitioners with authority over what we claim.