Trust Center
The charter is the mechanism behind the accountability commitment — composition, compensation, authority, and the protections that make dissent safe.
Verassa evidence protocol
Evidence
01Screenshot, DOM, replay, and axe baseline captured before decisions.
Judgment
02Reviewer route, rationale, and owner stay attached to lower-confidence work.
Verification
03Re-scan records and disclaimers travel with reportable outputs.
Charter status
Composition
The charter sets the board's composition: disabled accessibility practitioners — certified specialists, advocates, and researchers — and the process by which members are nominated and seated.
It defines a minimum board size and the requirement that the board is majority disabled practitioners, so the accountability is real and not symbolic.
Compensation
The charter records that board members are compensated with a monthly retainer and equity. Compensation is a charter commitment, not a discretionary line item, so it cannot quietly disappear under budget pressure.
Dissent and terms
The charter protects dissent: the right of a member to disagree on the record, and the requirement that disagreement is documented rather than suppressed. A board that cannot safely dissent is not an accountability mechanism.
It sets term limits and a renewal process, so the board stays independent and does not calcify.
Appeals
The charter defines how a refused-use-case decision, or a contested product or marketing claim, is appealed to the board, and the timeline for a response.
Until the charter is published in full, these commitments stand as stated here and are binding on the product.