Skip to main content
Design-partner cohort open · evidence-backed accessibility operationsApply
Verassaerassa
MethodologyPricing
Sign inBook a demo
Loading…
Verassaerassa

Evidence-backed digital accessibility operations with qualified human review, careful claims, and exportable proof.

Private beta

Apply to evaluate the platform →

Platform

  • Overview
  • How it works
  • Methodology
  • Evidence packages
  • Pricing

Workflows

  • Product and engineering
  • Legal and compliance
  • Accessibility consultancies
  • Ecommerce

Trust

  • Trust Center
  • Security
  • Privacy
  • Claim boundaries

Learn

  • Docs
  • Research
  • Changelog
  • State of Web Accessibility

Company

  • About
  • Contact sales

AI-augmented accessibility evaluation. Findings accelerate audit production but do not replace qualified-reviewer attestation. No scan is a conformance guarantee.

  • Policies
  • Accessibility statement
  • Refused use cases

© 2026 Verassa. Evidence-backed accessibility operations.

Trust Center

Advisory board public charter

The charter is the mechanism behind the accountability commitment — composition, compensation, authority, and the protections that make dissent safe.

Verassa evidence protocol

  1. Evidence

    01

    Screenshot, DOM, replay, and axe baseline captured before decisions.

  2. Judgment

    02

    Reviewer route, rationale, and owner stay attached to lower-confidence work.

  3. Verification

    03

    Re-scan records and disclaimers travel with reportable outputs.

Charter status

The formal charter is being ratified with the founding advisory board. It will be published here in full before any paid public launch. The sections below describe what the charter covers.

Composition

Who serves, and how they are selected

The charter sets the board's composition: disabled accessibility practitioners — certified specialists, advocates, and researchers — and the process by which members are nominated and seated.

It defines a minimum board size and the requirement that the board is majority disabled practitioners, so the accountability is real and not symbolic.

Compensation

How members are paid

The charter records that board members are compensated with a monthly retainer and equity. Compensation is a charter commitment, not a discretionary line item, so it cannot quietly disappear under budget pressure.

Authority

Veto authority and its scope

The charter defines the board's veto authority over product features and marketing claims: what is in scope for veto, how a veto is exercised, and the record kept when one is.

It also defines the board's role as the appeal body for refused-use-case decisions, so refusals are applied fairly rather than negotiated by sales.

Dissent and terms

Protected dissent, and term limits

The charter protects dissent: the right of a member to disagree on the record, and the requirement that disagreement is documented rather than suppressed. A board that cannot safely dissent is not an accountability mechanism.

It sets term limits and a renewal process, so the board stays independent and does not calcify.

Appeals

The appeal process

The charter defines how a refused-use-case decision, or a contested product or marketing claim, is appealed to the board, and the timeline for a response.

Until the charter is published in full, these commitments stand as stated here and are binding on the product.

Back to the Trust Center →