Loading…
Product
The human-review layer. A qualified reviewer makes the judgment calls a model should not make alone — and their name goes on the result.
Verassa evidence protocol
Evidence
01Screenshot, DOM, replay, and axe baseline captured before decisions.
Judgment
02Reviewer route, rationale, and owner stay attached to lower-confidence work.
Verification
03Re-scan records and disclaimers travel with reportable outputs.
What the reviewer does
Diagnostic agents produce candidate findings with evidence and a confidence score. Professional Review is where a qualified reviewer works that queue: confirming a finding, dismissing it with a recorded rationale, or routing it to an owner.
Lower-confidence findings route to review automatically; higher-confidence findings can be auto-confirmed, on thresholds the customer sets. The reviewer's time goes where judgment is actually needed.
Why it matters
An accessibility finding often turns on context a model cannot be trusted to weigh alone: whether alt text is meaningful here, whether a pattern is a real barrier or an acceptable variation. Professional Review keeps that judgment with a qualified human.
It is also what makes a deliverable defensible. An external report carries the reviewer's name and the date — accountability, not just output.
A demo walks through how findings move from an agent to a reviewer to a decision.